BlockRazor overall win rate
747 / 797 valid pairsBLOCKRAZOR VS. BLOXROUTE
Multi-chain low-latencyinfrastructure comparison
Compare data delivery and transaction submission by chain.
MEASURED VERDICTBSC TRANSACTION SUBMISSION93.73% BSC REGIONAL CONSISTENCY4/4 ROBINHOOD SEQUENCER FEED95.47% ROBINHOOD P99 LEAD38.749ms
Leading results across BSC and Robinhood Chain.
regions led across every reported category
Virginia / Frankfurt / Dublin / Tokyofirst-arrival win rate across 2,911 samples
BlockRazor vs bloXroutebloXroute relative delay
P50 2.573ms / max 130.015msBSC
From first-arrival data to public transaction submission
This benchmark compares the BSC services in BlockRazor Package with the equivalent BSC services in bloXroute Enterprise. Matched six-hour tests ran in four regions between September 23 and 25, 2026.
| MEASURE | BLOCKRAZOR | BLOXROUTE | TEST SCOPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node Stream first arrival | 53.72-75.31% | 17.78-45.18% | Four regional clients |
| Block Stream first arrival | 65.38-95.77% | 4.23-34.62% | 191,455 first-arrival decisions |
| Mempool first arrival | 56.71-85.09% | 14.91-43.29% | Transactions observed by both |
| Mempool observed share | 99.46-99.76% | 69.31-78.44% | Share of the union of unique hashes |
| Public transaction race | 93.73% (747 wins) | 6.27% (50 wins) | 797 valid paired submissions |
REGIONAL BREAKDOWN
The lead was not isolated to one region
Bars show Block Stream first arrival, with Node, Mempool, coverage, and submission results below.
Virginia
95.77%- Node
- 75.31% vs 17.78%
- Mempool
- 85.09% vs 14.91%
- Coverage
- 99.72% vs 77.86%
- Send wins
- 96.48%
Frankfurt
77.07%- Node
- 74.68% vs 24.38%
- Mempool
- 61.10% vs 38.90%
- Coverage
- 99.68% vs 76.73%
- Send wins
- 91.00%
Dublin
65.38%- Node
- 53.72% vs 45.18%
- Mempool
- 56.71% vs 43.29%
- Coverage
- 99.76% vs 69.31%
- Send wins
- 92.50%
Tokyo
80.63%- Node
- 68.40% vs 30.64%
- Mempool
- 76.92% vs 23.08%
- Coverage
- 99.46% vs 78.44%
- Send wins
- 94.95%
ROBINHOOD CHAIN
Sequencer Feed relative arrival latency
This benchmark compares BlockRazor Robinhood Chain Sequencer Feed with the Robinhood Chain feed in bloXroute Enterprise. One test client connected to both feeds; the first arrival was assigned 0ms and the other source recorded the relative delay.
2,911matched samples
2.573msbloXroute P50 relative delay
130.015msmaximum relative delay
| SOURCE | COUNT | WIN RATE | P50 | P70 | P80 | P90 | P95 | P99 | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlockRazor | 2,911 | 95.47% | 0.000ms | 0.000ms | 0.000ms | 0.000ms | 0.000ms | 0.480ms | 1.960ms |
| bloXroute | 2,911 | 4.53% | 2.573ms | 4.475ms | 6.958ms | 11.401ms | 16.366ms | 38.749ms | 130.015ms |
WHY BLOCKRAZOR01 02 03
A complete low-latency stack
See signals sooner
Receive blocks, mempool data, shreds, FlashBlocks, or sequencer updates earlier, giving your strategy more time to decide and act.
Improve transaction position
Use low-latency submission paths to improve your chance of earlier inclusion and a better onchain position when every block or slot matters.
Integrate with less effort
Connect through documented endpoints and familiar interfaces, with one team supporting both your data and transaction paths.
Choose around production constraints
BR
Choose BlockRazor if
- The published BSC or Robinhood Chain test matches your critical production path
- You need real-time data and low-latency transaction submission across BlockRazor's five documented chains
- Earlier signals and better transaction position matter more than preserving the current provider integration
- You can validate the gain with the same host, region, parser, and workload
BX
Keep bloXroute if
- Your stack relies on bloXroute's BDN, Gateway, Cloud API, or chain-specific execution APIs, and migration cost outweighs the measured benefit
- You need a bloXroute-supported chain or specialized capability outside BlockRazor's current documented catalog
- A like-for-like test on your chain, region, parser, and workload shows no material BlockRazor advantage
Fair conclusion: validate on your own production path.
FAQ
Is this comparison limited to BSC?
No. The page covers BlockRazor's documented products across BSC, Ethereum, Solana, Base, and Robinhood Chain. Published benchmark results remain separated by chain and workload so that a result is not generalized beyond its test scope.
What does the Robinhood Chain 95.47% win rate mean?
Across 2,911 matched deliveries in the supplied comparison, BlockRazor arrived first in 95.47% of samples and bloXroute arrived first in 4.53%. The first feed was assigned 0 ms for each sample, and the other feed's relative delay was measured from the timestamp difference.
What was the strongest BSC result?
BlockRazor won 747 of 797 valid public-transaction races, a 93.73% overall win rate. Its Block Stream first-arrival share ranged from 65.38% to 95.77% across the four tested regions.
Should I reproduce the benchmarks from my own servers?
Yes. Region, network topology, parser, workload, and transaction configuration can change outcomes. Use the published results to define a test, then validate the relevant chain and product from your production path.
START WITH YOUR WORKLOAD
Choose the chain, signal, and submission path. Then test it in your region.
Explore the multi-chain catalog and pair receiving and sending services around your production constraints.